Because they don’t follow RFC6040 and therefore we do something different in some corner cases.
> Am 22.09.2018 um 06:52 schrieb Dino Farinacci <[email protected]>: > >> However, I totally disagree with your comment on providing details that are >> not implemented. If they are not implemented correctly, it might even be >> more important to spell them out in this document, so implementors have >> chance to update their (future) implementation to do the correct thing. >> Having deployed implementations that are non standard-conform always happens >> and in this case it is probably not specifically problematic as it doesn’t >> impact interoperability. However, it is important though that the spec is >> correct. > > And why do you think they are implemented incorrectly? > > Dino > _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
