Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis-20: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6830bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I unfortunately ran out of time to do more than a cursory review of the LISP documents on this week's telechat. My apologies. I find the SEC ADs' DISCUSS positions concerning, though, and support the resolution of their security concerns. Section 15 of RFC 6830 lists a number of open issues and areas for future work. It seems like at least some of these are not addressed in this round of document updates. I would have expected some more explicit discussion of how the bis document addresses those areas, or why it does not need to. I'm curious why there are several authors listed with an affiliation (Cisco) who no longer have that affiliation AFAIK. _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
