Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-06: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-gpe/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- In the thread with the Gen-ART reviewer, the rationale that was given for advancing this document now even though rfc6834bis is nascent was: "We do not expect big changes in any bis document, since they are just the PS version of deployed technology." This seems somewhat less likely given the feedback received on the LISP documents on the telechat this week, so I'd like to discuss whether it really makes sense to advance this one now given its normative dependencies on 6834bis and 6830bis. _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
