> On Sep 27, 2018, at 1:27 PM, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> This should be an easy fix but I would like to see it fixed before
>> publication.
>> When talking about IPv6 packets being larger than L, the correct behavior
>> should be to send an ICMPv6 message with Type 2 (Packet Too Big) instead of
>> the
>> Destination Unreachable (Type 1) message as specified in the text. The text
>> *is
>> correct* for IPv4 messages with the DF bit set where the Destination
>> Unreachable (Type 3) is the right kind of message to send.
>
> Consider this fixed in -21. We had this comment before and missed this one
> occurence. I will make it the same language to be consistent with section
> 7.2. Thanks.
Awesome Dino. Will clear as soon as -21 hits.
Regards
Suresh
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
