Luigi, all, I support handing this to the AD as soon as the few remaining open comments on this document coming from the review of 6833/30bis are closed.
Thanks, Alberto On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 5:01 AM Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote: > Folks, > > this WG Last Call has been out for a while and we did not receive > substantial feedback. > > Note that following the discussion on the main specs (the two bis > documents) LISP-SEC is supposed to be MTI - Mandatory To Implement. > > Please send your support gif you want to see this happening. > > Ciao > > L. > > > On 28 Jan 2019, at 14:29, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > since work on bis documents is re-starting to move forward it is about > time to move forward other pieces of the LISP ecosystem. > > As such the LISP Security document has been revised a while ago for two > reason: > - Make sure is PS quality > - Make sure it is compliant with latest changes in the bis documents. > > The second point has been re-checked by the authors just last week, and > seems we are ready to move the document forward. > > This email open the usual two weeks Working Group Last Call, to end > February 11th, 2019. > > Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is > ready for handing to the AD. > If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain what it > would take to address your concerns. > > Thanks > > Luigi & Joel > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp >
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
