> I'm not sure I understand the need for "use a different key for consecutive > messages", but probably we should just talk about that on Tuesday.
Well in your last reply you felt it was okay if we used the nonce in each Map-Register for a new key per message. What this addition brings is use of a different PSK with nonce for a new authentication key, per message. If you think it’s not necessary, we can leave it out. But it is not clear to me if you support app-key per Fabio’s suggestion. Can you clarify that a nonce and PSK by themselves is sufficient? Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list lisp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
