Dino, Mike, if ok would like to add to this important  thread -

One practical use of LISP EIDs which is being deployed in US cities and major 
metropolitans is that of IP addressable shared geo-states.
In these use-cases each geo-cell in a formal grid of the earth, for example H3 
resolution 9 in draft-lisp-nexagon, is allocated unique EID.

This allows for interoperable connectionless session layer - publish (ucast) 
and subscribe (mcast) sharing - of geo-state via EID addressable broker. Formal 
EID brokers enable real-time enumeration of road safety-defects-furniture, 
verified and shared multi-vendor while protecting sources privacy.

There are ~5B H3 resolution 9 hexagons on earth out of which ~1% need to be 
addressable, 50M EID networked hexagons.
We allocated a sub-block of 2001:5::/32 EID experimental for this purpose, 
64bit H3 IDs mapped algorithmically to 128bit EIDs.

Extending the draft will help leveraging the network for real-time 
public-safety using addressable brokering for better verification, privacy, and 
secure linear (vs polynomial) interoperability effort. 



--szb
Cell: +972.53.2470068
WhatsApp: +1.650.492.0794

> On Aug 2, 2019, at 7:23 PM, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Mike, I have cc’ed the LISP WG in this response. Thanks for providing the 
> active assignments.
> 
> As a member of the LISP WG, I would like to vote for an update to RFC 7955 to 
> have the 2001:5::/32 block stay allocated until 2022.
> 
> Thanks Mike.
> 
> Dino
> 
>> On Aug 2, 2019, at 2:33 AM, RIPE NCC Support <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> ##- Please type your reply above this line -##
>> Ticket (202719) has been updated. To add additional comments, reply to this 
>> email.
>> 
>> Mike Petrusha (RIPE NCC Support) 
>> Aug 2, 11:33 CEST
>> 
>> Dear Dino,
>> 
>> We sent a number of e-mails to LISP WG and received no reply still.
>> 
>> We are not sure if this reply will appear on the mailing list, if not, could 
>> you please forward it there.
>> 
>> With regards to the questions about number of assignments:
>> as you can see at 
>> https://apps.db.ripe.net/db-web-ui/#/query?searchtext=-rMT%20inet6num%202001:5::%2F32
>>  there are currently fouractive registrations within 2001:5::/32
>> 
>> Also, from https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/lisp-announce/ you can 
>> see that another five assignments existed in the past and have either 
>> expired or were returned.
>> 
>> ----- Forwarded message -----
>> 
>> Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 09:34:31 +0200
>> From: "RIPE NCC" <[email protected]>
>> To: Deborah Brungard <[email protected]>,
>>        Luigi Iannone <[email protected]>,
>>        Joel Halpern <[email protected]>,
>>        Padma Pillay-Esnault <[email protected]>,
>>        LISP WG <[email protected]>
>> Subject: LISP EID assignments from 2001:5::/32
>> 
>> 
>> Dear LISP WG,
>> 
>> This e-mail is from the RIPE NCC, the Internet Registry in Europe.
>> 
>> The RIPE NCC provides temporary LISP EID assignments from LISP EID prefix 
>> 2001:5::/32 in accordance with RFC 7955: LISP EID Block Management, 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7955
>> 
>> We are contacting you as we are approaching August 2019, at which point we 
>> need to start removing existing LISP EID assignments within 2001:5::/32 
>> (unless IETF made a decision to extend this period).
>> 
>> Following RFC 7955, https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7955
>> "According to the 3+3 year experimentation plan, defined in
>> [RFC 7954], all registrations MUST end by August 2019, unless
>> the IETF community decides to grant a permanent LISP EID
>> address block."
>> 
>> In accordance with RFC 7954: LISP EID Block
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7954#section-6
>> "  IANA allocated the requested address space in September 2016 for a
>>   duration of 3 (three) years (through September 2019), with an option
>>   to extend this period by 3 (three) more years (until September 2022).
>>   By the end of the first period, the IETF will provide a decision on
>>   whether to transform the prefix into a permanent assignment or to put
>>   it back in the free pool..."
>> 
>> Could you please let us know whether such decision was made by the IETF?
>> 
>> 
>> According to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7954#section-7
>> "  In order to trigger the process for a permanent allocation, a
>>   document is required.  Such a document has to articulate the
>>   rationale for why a permanent allocation would be beneficial.  More
>>   specifically, the document has to detail the experience gained during
>>   experimentation and all of the technical benefits provided by the use
>>   of a LISP-specific prefix. "
>> 
>> Could you please let us know if such document was created?
>> 
>> 
>> According to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7954#section-7
>> "  If no explicit action is carried out by the end of the experiment (by
>>   September 2019), it is automatically considered that there was not
>>   sufficient interest in having a permanent allocation; therefore, the
>>   address block will be returned to the free pool."
>> 
>> Based on this, the RIPE NCC is ready to proceed with removing existing LISP 
>> EID assignments within 2001:5::/32 in August 2019 (as defined by RFC 7955) 
>> and returning 2001:5::/32 to the IANA in September 2019 (as defined by RFC 
>> 7954).
>> 
>> We await your reply.
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Sincerely,
>> 
>> Mike Petrusha
>> RIPE NCC
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> farinacci
>> Aug 1, 19:00 CEST
>> 
>> I am still using this block but RIPE wants to remove it per IETF 
>> recommendations. Should we update RFC 7955 to indicate the “experiment” is 
>> still continuing?
>> 
>> Dino
>> 
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>> 
>>> From: RIPE NCC Support <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: #202719 - Re: LISP EID prefix 2001:5:3::/48
>>> Date: August 1, 2019 at 5:09:09 AM PDT
>>> To: farinacci <[email protected]>
>>> Reply-To: RIPE NCC Support <[email protected]>
>> 
>> 
>> Mike Petrusha (RIPE NCC Support) 
>> Aug 1, 14:09 CEST
>> 
>> Dear Colleagues,
>> 
>> The RIPE NCC have assigned LISP EID prefix 2001:5:3::/48 to lispers.net on 
>> 2016-11-16.
>> 
>> The assigned prefix will be removed on 31 August 2019.
>> 
>> According to RFC 7955, https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7955
>> "According to the 3+3 year experimentation plan, defined in
>> [RFC 7954], all registrations MUST end by August 2019, unless
>> the IETF community decides to grant a permanent LISP EID
>> address block."
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Sincerely,
>> 
>> Mike Petrusha
>> RIPE NCC
>> 
>> 
>> This email is a service from RIPE NCC Support.
>> [PMZV6Q-QO6Q]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to