> Yes, we considered adding an IID. However, since this means changing the WG > kernel code, we discarded this option in favor of a user-space solution. I > agree that it would be a nice addition though :)
How about use source-port in UDP header. That can be done in user space. You lose load-balancing but you caould use 10-bits for IID and 6 bits for entropy. > From an implementation perspective I don't think it's straightforward to do > LISP in WG encapsulation without substantial processing overhead. Right now > we're programming the WG interface, but if we want LISP in WG we probably > need handling packets in user space also. Well I would think the overhead would be the same as any other encapsulation. But to compare apples with apples, you’d have to put the LISP encapsulation in the kernel as well. So back to your first point. Are there any spare bits in the WG header. Which is the default encapsulation it uses. If its IPsec, there are plenty of usable bits in the ESP/AH header. ;-) Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list lisp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
