Joel, Another topic that we have been waiting to bring back is the "reliable transport" draft.
Last time we discussed the architecture we agreed to simplify the draft, removing some implementation specific details, but we had a couple of points outstanding: - The registration refresh message. We have narrowed it down to specific use-cases where it would be used but need to reach an agreement on its use. - Simplification of the message types and reuse of existing message types within the reliable transport framework. We'd like to take the chance to recover this discussion so that the draft can be accepted as a WG document. Thanks, Marc On 3/10/20, 2:44 PM, "lisp on behalf of Joel M. Halpern" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: Vancouver has been cancelled. We have several ways we can hold a virtual interim. (The chairs have a webex available, and Fabio has offered one.) I understand that folks want to present their work. But what I am looking for if we are going to get folks together is actual engagement on the list. Indication that there are things worth discussing. Yours, Joel _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
