How about adding to the agenda a status on 6830bis and 6833bis. And maybe cause the interim to be a deadline to get the reviewers to remove their DISCUSS items?
Dino > On Apr 14, 2020, at 6:11 AM, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote: > > Folks, > > ever since the face to face meeting has been cancelled there has been some > discussion on the mailing list concerning the possibility to set up an > interim meeting. > > We received requests for presentation slots, namely: > - NAT Traversal > - LISP Nexagon > - LISP PubSub > - LISP Wireguard > - LISP Uberlay > > We posted a doodle to schedule the meeting: > https://doodle.com/poll/cwnba6vy9ar2vr46 > > Yet, _only_ 6 people did respond to the doodle. > This is barely one more than the presenters. > > As we said in the past we will schedule an interim if we consider that there > will be useful discussion. > With only 6 attendees and 5 slots it does not seem the case. > > If the WG is not motivated in an interim then we will not schedule one. > > We will leave the dolde open one more week. If, in one week time, there is > not a substantial interest from the WG no interim will be scheduled. > > Ciao > > L. > > >> On 3 Apr 2020, at 08:07, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> a few topics have been mentioned on the mailing list as possible discussion >> items during an interim meeting. >> >> We invite all people to continue discussion these on topics on the mailing >> list, while we set up an interim meeting. >> >> For the latter, we need to fix the date. You can find a proposal of few >> possible days at: https://doodle.com/poll/cwnba6vy9ar2vr46 >> >> Please answer the doodle, it will remain open until next Friday (April 10th). >> >> Ciao >> >> L. >> >> Stay safe, Stay Home! > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
