Perfect :-) Thanks Fabio
L. > On 3 Jun 2020, at 19:00, Fabio Maino (fmaino) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Done! > > Fabio > > From: Fabio Maino <[email protected]> > Date: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 at 9:43 AM > To: Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-15.txt > > Sounds good Luigi. > > I’ll publish an updated version that reflects your suggestions later today. > > Fabio > > From: Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 at 10:45 PM > To: Fabio Maino <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-15.txt > Resent-From: <[email protected]> > Resent-To: Fabio Maino <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, > <[email protected]>, Darrel Lewis <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> > Resent-Date: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 at 10:44 PM > > Hello again, > > if you agree to change the text as for may previous email table in section 6 > IANA Considerations must be updated as well. > > Ciao > > L. > > > > > > > > >> On 3 Jun 2020, at 07:38, Luigi Iannone <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi Fabio, >> >> thanks for the clarification. I think that I finally got it: >> >> 0x7E to 0x7F is for just experimentation. >> >> 0xFE to 0xFF is for shim headers experimentation >> >> My confusion came from the fact that is not clearly stated. >> >> Can we modify the text as: >> >> 0x7E to 0x7F: Experimentation and testing >> 0x80 to 0xFD: Unassigned (shim headers) >> 0xFE to 0xFF: Experimentation and testing (shim headers) >> >> So that the difference is clearly stated. >> >> Ciao >> >> L. >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 2 Jun 2020, at 19:34, Fabio Maino (fmaino) <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Ciso Luigi, please see below... >>> >>> On 6/2/20, 12:11 AM, "Luigi Iannone" <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> On 1 Jun 2020, at 07:53, Fabio Maino (fmaino) <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Ciao Luigi, >>>> The reason is to allow to experiment with shim headers and non-shim >>>> headers at the same time. As you may remember shim headers have a more >>>> fixed encodng and must be located before non-shim headers. >>> >>> That is OK for me. >>> >>> But my question is why this: >>> >>> >>> >>>> 0x7E to 0x7F: Experimentation and testing >>> >>> FM> The two above are for experimentation of NON shim headers >>> >>> >>> >>>> 0x80 to 0xFD: Unassigned (shim headers) >>>> 0xFE to 0xFF: Experimentation and testing >>> >>> >>> >>>> FM These two are for experimentation of shim headers. >>> >>> Shim headers are placed (and processed) first, so we want to give the >>> freedom to experiment with both. >>> >>> For example, one would want to experiment with a shim header (identified by >>> 0xFE) that carries some special metadata for IPv4 payloads, while someone >>> else would want to experiment with IPv8 payloads (identified with 0x7E). A >>> third person might want to experiment, at the same time, with a shim header >>> that carries special metadata for IPv8. >>> >>> Fabio >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Instead of this (range has been adapted): >>> >>> 0x7E to 0xFB: Unassigned (shim headers) >>> 0xFC to 0xFF: Experimentation and testing >>> >>> ?? >>> >>> Certainly I am missing something ;-) >>> >>> Ciao >>> >>> L. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Fabio >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 5/31/20, 10:47 PM, "Luigi Iannone" <[email protected] >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Thank you for updating the document. >>>> >>>> I have a quick question. >>>> >>>> Looking at the next protocol values we now see: >>>> >>>> 0x7E to 0x7F: Experimentation and testing >>>> 0x80 to 0xFD: Unassigned (shim headers) >>>> 0xFE to 0xFF: Experimentation and testing >>>> >>>> Can you provide a rationale why not having just one bigger >>>> experimentation and testing range instead of two with an unassigned range >>>> in the middle? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> Ciao >>>> >>>> L. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 1 Jun 2020, at 07:41, [email protected] >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >>>>> directories. >>>>> This draft is a work item of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol WG of the >>>>> IETF. >>>>> >>>>> Title : LISP Generic Protocol Extension >>>>> Authors : Fabio Maino >>>>> Jennifer Lemon >>>>> Puneet Agarwal >>>>> Darrel Lewis >>>>> Michael Smith >>>>> Filename : draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-15.txt >>>>> Pages : 15 >>>>> Date : 2020-05-31 >>>>> >>>>> Abstract: >>>>> This document describes extentions to the Locator/ID Separation >>>>> Protocol (LISP) Data-Plane, via changes to the LISP header, to >>>>> support multi-protocol encapsulation. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-gpe/ >>>>> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-gpe/> >>>>> >>>>> There are also htmlized versions available at: >>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-15 >>>>> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-15> >>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-15 >>>>> >>>>> A diff from the previous version is available at: >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lisp-gpe-15 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >>>>> submission >>>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >>>>> >>>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >>>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> lisp mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
