Agreed, I believe the draft is mature enough and at this point can be moved to Informational RFC.
Alberto On 8/4/20, 12:14 PM, "lisp on behalf of Dino Farinacci" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > I think this draft addresses some really interesting use cases, so I would like to see it advanced. I agree and think the working group should allow the draft to transition to Informational RFC. And I believe we should do it as quickly as possible. Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
