Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lisp-sec-27: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-sec/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Sections 8.1 through 8.5 all create registries with "Specification Required" rules. RFC 8126 says this about "Specification Required": As with Expert Review (Section 4.5), clear guidance to the designated expert should be provided when defining the registry, and thorough understanding of Section 5 is important. Only Section 8.5 includes any such guidance. Is none needed for the other four? Also, I'm having trouble understanding the advice that Section 8.5 does give. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I concur with John; this was generally well-done and easy to understand. Nice work. A couple of suggestions: In Section 6.1 has: E: ETR-Cant-Sign bit. This bit is set to 1 to signal ... I think you mean "If this bit is set to 1, it signals ..." or something similar. Taken literally, the current text means you always set it to 1, but I don't think that's what you meant to say. I think the fifth paragraph of Section 6.4 is missing a period or something. I found it hard to parse toward the end. _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
