On a related Note. Wanted to bring up next move on the charter. I think we can 
all agree that addressable naming like in lisp-nexagon H3 EIDs is part of lisp 
application edge routing theme that is already active in the wg. This is timely 
in light of private mobile, and mobile edge compute trends and gaps.

There are many reasons to factor compute from cloud to edge, latency, capacity, 
regulation, but mostly cost. There is a very high centralization tax in cloud 
vs edge as far as margins and energy/cooling bills that can be saved. However 
its not easy to factor workloads from cloud to edge:

1) before any client API reaches an edge service it should be “TSA Pre-checked” 
who what where this client is and that this specific edge server can address 
this specific query right now. This is without compromising client privacy and 
security as there is no wall of application servers shielding clients from 
services. Neither  is there east-west pinball between fragmented micro services 
across edge location. LISP routing per named logical addressing for both 
clients and services are very applicable.

2) any edgefied service has to be able to encapsulate logic and state units in 
portable manner, allow  for elastic allocation across edge servers. During 
peaks less units per server and more edge locations, and visa verse. There is 
also need for quick recovery from locations (fragmanted) failures. In this 
context what comes to mind for edge cloud migration is factoring to edge 
anything digital-twin. In that sense nexagons are just one example of road-tile 
twin. And again LISP named routing steering quickly between failed or overflow 
locations by name location mapping and separation.   

Wonder what is the chairs, group thinking here.


--szb
Cell: +972.53.2470068
WhatsApp: +1.650.492.0794

> On Sep 5, 2022, at 12:21, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> This call for adoption was open for a while now and there were several emails 
> in support of the adoption.
> 
> As such, there is a clear consensus in adopting this document.
> 
> The authors are invited to submit a new version of the document renamed as WG 
> item.
> 
> Thanks to all people that expressed their opinion.
> 
> Ciao
> 
> L.
>> On 5 Aug 2022 at 17:22 +0200, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]>, wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> The authors of the lisp-name-encoding draft (see below) have requested 
>> working group adoption for this document.
>> 
>> This email starts a three weeks call for working group adoption of this 
>> document.
>> 
>> Please respond, positively or negatively.  Silence does NOT mean consent.  
>> Please include explanation / motivation / reasoning for your view.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> 
>> Luigi & Joel
>> 
>>> On 24 Jul 2022, at 17:17, Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> We have made changes to -15 to address Joel's comments. Thanks to Marc and 
>>> Joel for their participation and cooperation.
>>> 
>>> I would like to, at this time, request for this draft to be a working group 
>>> document. I will present the status and changes to -15 at the LISP WG.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Dino
>>> 
>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>> 
>>>> From: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: [lisp] I-D Action: draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-15.txt
>>>> Date: July 24, 2022 at 8:15:25 AM PDT
>>>> To: <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>>> Reply-To: [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
>>>> directories.
>>>> This draft is a work item of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol WG of the 
>>>> IETF.
>>>> 
>>>>        Title           : LISP Distinguished Name Encoding
>>>>        Author          : Dino Farinacci
>>>>  Filename        : draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-15.txt
>>>>  Pages           : 9
>>>>  Date            : 2022-07-24
>>>> 
>>>> Abstract:
>>>>   This draft defines how to use the AFI=17 Distinguished Names in LISP.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding/
>>>> 
>>>> There is also an htmlized version available at:
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-15
>>>> 
>>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-farinacci-lisp-name-encoding-15
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at 
>>>> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> lisp mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> lisp mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to