A couple of comments, beyond "looks good", which it does.
The SFC working group is winding down. You should probably ask our AD
where you should point for collaboration on NSH.
There is an oddity about the references to Informational and
Experimental RFCs. First, those are not maturity levels. Maturity level
is PS or IS. Second, the first part of the charter says we will only
work on standards track documents. I think that is the place to say
that we will also work on relevant Informational and Experimental work.
Probably with some verbiage that says Informational would be drafts
which talk about how to use the LISP tools, and Experimental would be
for things which need further evaluation (success or failure of the
experiment) that add to the LISP protocol suite.
Yours,
Joel
On 10/5/2022 4:39 AM, Luigi Iannone wrote:
Hi All,
Padma and myself did work on an first draft of a possible new charter
for the LISP WG.
We need now input from you about what is missing or what is not there.
The charter can be found at:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PbvubD9kXAxqtUCe37n8suC5b-jZ_aGmVv6TAt89VIA/edit
And also hereafter.
Please share your thoughts on the mailing list.
Ciao
L.
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
