LGTM! :-) Thanks!
Alvaro. On January 13, 2023 at 2:55:06 AM, [email protected] ( [email protected]) wrote: Hi Alvaro, Thanks for the follow-up. > I've looked at your replies and the diffs using the version - > 10. I still have a couple of comments in-line -- mostly about the > instructions to the designated experts. What is really key is that DEs motivate their decision and work with requesters to make a request successful. DEs usually consult with each other, but I don't need to we need to have this in the text. Below an updated DE text to reflect some of your comments. NEW: The policy for allocating new bits from this sub-registry is Specification Required (Section 4.6 of [RFC8126]). Review requests are evaluated on the advice of one or more designated experts. Criteria that should be applied by the designated experts include determining whether the proposed registration duplicates existing entries and whether the registration description is sufficiently detailed and fits the purpose of this registry. These criteria are considered in addition to those already provided in Section 4.6 of [RFC8126] (e.g., the proposed registration must be documented in a permanent and readily available public specification). The designated experts will either approve or deny the registration request, communicating this decision to IANA. Denials should include an explanation and, if applicable, suggestions as to how to make the request successful. Cheers, Med
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
