Hi Warren, 

Thanks for the review. 

Good catches. Fixed almost all of them as you can see at [1].

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Warren Kumari via Datatracker <[email protected]>
> Envoyé : lundi 13 février 2023 17:41
> À : The IESG <[email protected]>
> Cc : [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Objet : Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-11:
> (with COMMENT)
> 
> Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub-11: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to
> all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to
> cut this introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-
> positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT
> positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found
> here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-pubsub/
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> COMMENT:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> 
> Much thanks to Al Morton for the OpsDir review
> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-lisp-pubsub-10-
> opsdir-lc-morton-2023-01-22/)
> I'm at a conference (NANOG) this week, and so the OpsDir reviews
> are especially
> useful.
> 
> I've provided some nits below -- feel free to address them when
> making other
> changes, or ignore them (they are just nits): 1: "The Locator/ID
> Separation
> Protocol (LISP) [RFC9300] [RFC9301] splits IP addresses in two
> different
> namespaces" - I think this is: "splits IP addresses into two
> different
> namespaces"
> 
> 2: "It is RECOMMENDED that the xTR uses persistent storage to keep
> nonce
> state." - I think this would be better as: "to keep the none
> state"
> 
> 3: "The Map-Server that receives the Map-Request will be the Map-
> Server
> responsible to notify that specific xTR " -> "responsible for
> notifying"
> 
> 4: "A similar problem may be experienced when a large number of
> state were
> simultaneously updated." - "states are"
> 
> 5: "Alternatively, the Map-Server can instead determine that such
> subscription
> request fails, and send" - "requests fail"
> 
> 6: "When the ITR wants to update the security association for that
> Map-Server
> and EID-Prefix, it follows again the procedure described in this
> section."  --
> I think that this is either "it follows the procedure described in
> this section
> again.", or 9probably better) "it once again follows..."
> 
> 7: "Note that if the Map-Server replies with a Map-Notify, none of
> the regular
> LISP-SEC steps regarding Map-Reply described in Section 5.7 of
> [RFC9303] takes
> place." - for readability, I think this would be better as "take
> place" or
> "occur".
> 
> 8: "Misbehaving nodes may send massive subscription requests which
> may lead to
> exhaust the resources of a Map-Server" - "exhausting"
> 
> 9: (Appendix): "The following subsections provides an inventory of
> some
> experience lessons from these deployments." - "provide"
> 
> 


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to