> Hi LISP WG, > > As for the subject, this email starts the discussion about: From Experimental > to ST: these are a bunch of RFC that may be considered to move ST > > There are a few experimental RFCs which is worth to be considered to be moved > to standard track (if we have documented deployment experience), namely: > > RFC 6832: Interworking between Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) and > Non-LISP Sites > RFC 8060: LISP Canonical Address Format (LCAF) [This is largely used and may > be merged with 9306] > RFC 8111: Locator/ID Separation Protocol Delegated Database Tree (LISP-DDT) > [The only scalable Mapping System so far…..]
Agree. > Multicast can be another one work item. > RFC 6831: The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) for Multicast Environments > RFC 8378: Signal-Free Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) Multicast The new draft that Prasad submitted this week makes it a trio with the above to. It addresses how to mix the functionality of 6831 and 8378 when there is a mix of native multicast and non-native multicast in the underlay. Dino > > Please send us back your thoughts. > > > Padma and Luigi > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
