>>> >>> Now, let’s take one step back: the real question seems to be how to signal >>> in the mapping system that an RLOC belongs to a RTR? >> >> You could do it with a distinguished-name AFI that is encoded with the RLOC >> address. > > Excellent. So we have another possibility beside LCAF.
Well to be specific, if you put a dist-name with the RLOC it is encoded as an AFI-list LCAF. But I know what you mean. You are proposing/considering a new LCAF type that identifies an RTR. Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
