> ### "LISP", paragraph 0
> ```
>  - NAT-Traversal: Support for a NAT-traversal solution in deployments where 
> LISP
>  tunnel endpoints are separated from by a NAT (e.g., LISP mobile node).
> ```
> Stick it into UDP and use existing NAT traversal solutions.
> Re-engineering all that does not seem worthwhile.

We are not starting from scratch and have used previous ideas. This has been 
deployed by various implementations for 10 years now. Its the WG catching up 
with implementations. That's the world we live in these days. You are too 
familiar with this.

This effort is simply a bit of clerical work.

Dino


_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp

Reply via email to