SG, please mention these points in the text. On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 8:38 AM Padma Pillay-Esnault <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Martin > > Please see PPE for my comments inline > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 11:50 AM Martin Duke via Datatracker < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for >> charter-ietf-lisp-04-06: Block >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-lisp/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> BLOCK: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Is the NAT traversal work going to prioritize existing solutions (e.g. >> STUN, >> TURN, ICE), or have all those already been determined to be inadequate? >> If the >> latter, LISP should coordinate with TSVWG on its NAT traversal solution. >> >> PPE - The symmetric or endpoint-address-and-port-dependent mapping NATs >> (ICE, TURN..) have been have been determined to be inadequate due to >> the nature of LISP that is typically unidirectional traffic and its usage >> of UDP port 4341 without specification of source port. >> > Yes - on coordination with TSVWG. >> > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Is the reliable transport protocol required to be secure? (e.g., are you >> looking at TCP/TLS, QUIC, and SCTP/DTLS, or just bare TCP/SCTP) >> >> PPE - The current reliable transport draft has a proposal for the use of >> bare TCP and fallback to UDP using the existing mechanisms for security in >> LISP. The document is being evaluated and reviewed. >> >> > Thanks > Padma >
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
