I support moving this document to the standards track. Balaji
On 1/22/24 11:55 PM, Marc Portoles Comeras (mportole) wrote: > > I also support moving this document to Standard track > > *From: *lisp <[email protected]> on behalf of Victor Moreno > <[email protected]> > *Date: *Friday, January 12, 2024 at 7:57?AM > *To: *Jordi Pailliss? <[email protected]> > *Cc: *[email protected] <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Re: [lisp] Moving draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding to standard > track? > > I support moving this document to the standards track. > > Victor > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 3:51?AM Jordi Pailliss? > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Support! > > Jordi > > El 11/1/24 a les 18:34, Fabio Maino (fmaino) ha escrit: > > I support moving this document to standard track > > Fabio > > *From: *lisp <[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of Luigi Iannone > <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> > *Date: *Thursday, January 11, 2024 at 4:53?AM > *To: *LISP mailing list list <[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected]> > *Cc: *[email protected] <[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected]> > *Subject: *[lisp] Moving draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding to > standard track? > > Hi All, > > Happy new year! > > As you may have seen from Alberto?s shepherd review of the > name encoding document, it is suggested to move the document > to standard track. > > Jim Guichard (our AD) is OK as long as the WG is OK with this > change and that deployment experience is added to the document. > > Hence, this email opens a two weeks call to check if you agree > with the change. > > Please reply to this email stating whether you are in favor or > you are against. > > (Silence does not count) > > Please reply. > > Ciao > > L. > > Begin forwarded message: > > *From: *"Alberto Rodriguez-Natal \(natal\)" > <[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected]> > > *Subject: [lisp] Shepherd's review of > draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding* > > *Date: *December 28, 2023 at 12:00:33 GMT+1 > > *To: *"[email protected]" <mailto:[email protected]> > <[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]> > > Hi all, > > The shepherd?s review of the LISP Distinguished Name > Encoding has been posted. The document is in good shape > and minor identified nits have been fixed. Please find the > review here: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding/shepherdwriteup/ > > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding/shepherdwriteup/> > > However, as part of the review, it was raised the question > if the document is in the right stream (currently in > Experimental). Given that there are known implementations > of the spec and that it has been running in production for > some time, my suggestion is to consider moving this > document to Standards track instead. > > Thanks, > > Alberto > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lisp mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lisp/attachments/20240123/e7800346/attachment.htm> ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp ------------------------------ End of lisp Digest, Vol 182, Issue 12 *************************************
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
