I support moving this document.
Thanks
Balaji
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 17:07:01 -0800
From: Victor Moreno <vimor...@google.com>
Subject: [lisp] Re: WG Last Call for Geo Coordinate Use Cases
To: Joel Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Message-ID:
<CAPUUEGhfsO+dmhkDbEqVqmwe3ao-ZgTMtLu7ZNf=cv1+gdr...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="000000000000877dd8062f013169"
I think the specificity that this document adds to the encoding of
geo-coordinates and the extension into geo-points makes this EID/LCAF type
usable in practice. I also think the document is ready for publication
after diligently fine tuning the specifics and incorporating what has been
learnt through implementation.
I support moving this document forward.
-v
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 8:28 AM Joel Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
> Dino, I have to speak up in support of the chairs.
>
> The process looks for working group support during the WG last call. The
> fact that there was support at some time in the past does not answer the
> question. The fact that there was no opposition at earlier times does not
> answer the question. If the working group does not care enough now to
> engage on the draft, then it doesn't advance. (I take no particular stance
> on the draft.)
>
> Yours,
>
> Joel
> On 2/25/2025 11:18 AM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>
> Well yes you have over the years, many times. Just not within this new
> period. But that doesn’t mean the previous support has vanished. Maybe
> those people aren’t participating in the IETF anymore.
>
> I suggest the chairs look at the WG email archives.
>
> Dino
>
> On Feb 25, 2025, at 4:32 AM, Luigi Iannone <g...@gigix.net> <g...@gigix.net>
> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> silence IS NTO consensus and insofar we did not receive feedback on this
> document.
>
> We extend the last call period for one more week, until 5th March.
>
> Please express your opinion on whether or not this document is ready to be
> published.
>
> Thanks
>
> Luigi & Padma
>
>
>
> On 12 Feb 2025, at 10:14, Luigi Iannone <g...@gigix.net> <g...@gigix.net>
> wrote:
>
> Dear WG
>
> This message starts a two-week WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lisp-geo
> ending on February 26th 2025.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-geo/
>
> This document describes how Geo-Coordinates can be used in the LISP
> Architecture and Protocols. The functionality proposes a new LISP
> Canonical Address Format (LCAF) encoding for such Geo-Coordinates,
> which is compatible with the Global Positioning Satellite (GPS)
> encodings used by other routing protocols.
>
> Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is
> ready to be handed over to the AD. If you have objections, please state
> your
> reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
>
> Note: silence IS NOT consensus.
>
> Thanks
>
> Padma and Luigi
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list -- lisp@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to lisp-le...@ietf.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list -- lisp@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to lisp-le...@ietf.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> lisp mailing list -- lisp@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to lisp-le...@ietf.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
A message part incompatible with plain text digests has been removed ...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 6932 bytes
Desc: not available
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list -- lisp@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to lisp-le...@ietf.org
------------------------------
End of lisp Digest, Vol 195, Issue 10
*************************************
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list -- lisp@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to lisp-le...@ietf.org
