Hi Dino,
> On 18 Mar 2025, at 22:04, Dino Farinacci <farina...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Regarding what you said here Luigi, creating a 32-bit IID was intentiional so > you can have more than 2^24 VPNs per instance of a data-plane. That is you > can duplicate IIDs if different mapping systems were used for the same > underlay. Yes, but RFC 9300 specifies IID as a 24 bits field. There is no inter-operable description in how to convert a 32-bit field in a 24-bit and vice versa. Hence we should just stick to 24 bits. > > Also there was something you said that was incorrect. You said "on the wire > the IID is 24-bits”. You are right on this. I did remeber the 8060 type 2 LCAF wrongly. > Well when control plane messages are sent on the wire they are 32-bits. So in > data packets its 24 and in control packets its 32. Which is an inconsistency and we should fix this now. Luigi > > Dino > > <PastedGraphic-1.png>_______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list -- lisp@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to lisp-le...@ietf.org _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list -- lisp@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to lisp-le...@ietf.org
