Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lisp-geo-15: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-geo/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # Éric Vyncke, INT AD, comments for ddraft-ietf-lisp-geo-15 CC @evyncke Thank you for the work put into this document. BTW, I love the idea ;-) and, somehow joking, it should also contain a field for the celestial body with TIPTOP & DTN WG being active. Please find below one blocking DISCUSS points (easy to address), some non-blocking COMMENT points/nits (replies would be appreciated even if only for my own education). Special thanks to Kiran Makhijani for the shepherd's detailed write-up including the WG consensus and the justification of the intended status BUT it lacks the IPR check (while optional, this would have been nice to have it). Please note that Tommy Pauly is the Internet directorate reviewer (at my request) and you may want to consider this int-dir review as well when it will be available (no need to wait for it though): https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-geo/reviewrequest/22048/ I hope that this review helps to improve the document, Regards, -éric ## DISCUSS (blocking) As noted in https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/, a DISCUSS ballot is just a request to have a discussion on the following topics: ### Abstract and other places A common error (done by this author as well) is to use "GPS" (a US commercial service) rather than GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System), which is generic as it includes GPS from USA, Galileo from Europe, Glonass, Beido. So, simply s/Global Positioning Satellite (GPS)/Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS)/ to have technical content and not commercial. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ## COMMENTS (non-blocking) ### Other DISCUSS I support Med Boucadair's point about DISCUSS on consistency of identification/characterisation of a geo-point across various IETF specifications (thank you Ketan for the text) ### Other COMMENT Erik Kline has a point in section 5 about the altitude definition, I was about to raise it to a DISCUSS. Deb Cooley has also a good point about what it the experiment scope, duration, and evaluation. ### Only static object Was it considered that object can be moving, i.e., having a speed vector ? ### Section 4.2 Like other ADs, I completely fail to understand that longest-prefix is akin largest-radius,i.e., longest-prefix is the most specific and largest-radius is the less specific. As many people do not understand, either the text is wrong or some explanations should be there. s/WiFi/Wi-Fi/ Like others, I am unsure whether referencing expired I-Ds is useful.$ ### Section 5 I have dealt with several coordinates systems and usually the latitude/longitude can be negative to indicate South or East ot <0, 0>. Why is this draft deviating from this well-accepted format ? This can only make things & algorithms more complex. Please reconsider. M-bit, I have serious doubt that GNSS are accurate enough to the centimeter of altitude without specific devices (and base stations on the ground). ### Section 9 Please add a URI for the IANA registry to avoid any ambiguity. _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list -- lisp@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to lisp-le...@ietf.org
