The text Luigi proposes ('this document....) is fine. TY.
Deb
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 12:02 PM Dino Farinacci <farina...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > 1. As for RFC2026: The "Experimental" designation typically denotes a
> specification that
> > is part of some research or development effort.
> >
> > This document is part of a development effort to include geo-coordinates
> in LISP. Is not part of an “experiment", as not all experimental RFC are
> necessarily part of an experiment. It is about the maturity level of the
> technology.
>
> If Deb is okay with this text, I will add to document.
>
> > 2. The history of LISP.
> >
> > Long story short, LISP was born as a big experiment and the WG chartered
> only to produce informational and experimental documents. With the
> deployment experience gathered through the years, the LISP WG has
> rechartered to move the most mature pieces of LISP to STD Track, but not
> all the pieces.
>
> This is informational for Deb. And I think everyone agrees something like
> this shouldn't go in this specific document. Otherwise it would need to go
> in every LISP document. Please ack or nak this Deb and other reviewers.
>
> Dino
>
>
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list -- lisp@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to lisp-le...@ietf.org
