To be more specific, shouldn't you have a pointer to the draft-ietf-geo-15 indicating that type = 17 is allocated to "Geo-Location"?
Dino > On Jul 7, 2025, at 4:42 PM, Dino Farinacci <farina...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm looking over your latest diff and will respond separately. Answering you > question, yes I think IANA should add these to the registry. > > Dino > >> On Jul 7, 2025, at 2:30 PM, Alvaro Retana <aretana.i...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Dear WG: >> >> We're working on rfc8060bis -- the main objective is to change the status to >> Proposed Standards (from Experimental). Please review the latest version >> [1]. >> >> The change log is at the end of the draft [2]. Note that the changes so far >> have been primarily focused on reordering, and removing mentions of >> Geo-Coordinates (draft-ietf-lisp-geo deprecates Type 5). >> >> Table 1 [3] includes the complete list of LCAF Types defined in rfc8060, >> where some were characterized as "unapproved" and not included in the >> registry [4]. This message is to poll the WG about implementations of these >> "unapproved" LCAF Types: >> >> Type 4: Application Data >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8060bis-02#name-convey-application-specific >> >> Type 6: Opaque Key >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8060bis-02#name-generic-database-mapping-lo >> >> Type 8: Nonce Locator >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8060bis-02#name-petr-admission-control-func >> >> Type 14: JSON Data Model >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8060bis-02#name-data-model-encoding >> >> Type 15: Key/Value Address Pair >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8060bis-02#name-encoding-key-value-address- >> >> Type 16: Encapsulation Format >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8060bis-02#name-multiple-data-planes >> >> >> The WG needs to decide whether these values should be added to the IANA >> registry or deprecated. >> >> If you know of an implementation or deployment of these LCAF Types, please >> let us know. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Alvaro. >> >> >> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8060bis-02 >> [2] >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8060bis-02#name-change-log >> >> [3] >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8060bis-02#name-lisp-canonical-address-forma >> >> [4] >> https://www.iana.org/assignments/lisp-parameters/lisp-parameters.xhtml#lisp-lcaf-type > > _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list -- lisp@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to lisp-le...@ietf.org
