Hi Roman The document was advancing the usual process and I was the shepherd but the main author announced he would retire in 2024. He did address at the time the wg last call comments in 2024. The AD and this last call is in 2025 and I am helping to advance the paper and added myself as editor. I am happy to relinquish it to someone else if this works better or more appropriate.
The original version of the document was followed by Luigi my co-chair. Thanks Padma On Tue, Jul 8, 2025 at 11:30 AM Roman Danyliw via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-lisp-te-21: Discuss > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-te/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > DISCUSS: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I would like to discuss the procedural elements of this document’s > advancement. > I observe that: > > -- The WG chair (Padma) who called the WGLC > (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/wXb2V_yZxFyXFV0gn0EinzNvTDE/) > and > declared consensus to publish > (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/TrBH2rZuqF3nhFZyV7-cYfNVwEw/) > on > -20 is now a listed document author as of -21. > > -- There don’t appear to be material changes between the -20 and -21 > drafts. > The diff > ( > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-lisp-te-20&url2=draft-ietf-lisp-te-21&difftype=--html > ) > suggests only additional example text. I was looking for a large blob of > text > changes which typically trigger late-stage changes in the author list. > > -- The document shepherd is also a document author. > > -- The shepherd’s report says, “The document was supported by 14 votes > (appropriate for the WG) and there were no objections.” My review of the > WGLC > thread > (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lisp/TrBH2rZuqF3nhFZyV7-cYfNVwEw/) > shows > that 3 non-authors responding. > > As I did not follow the entire lifecycle of this document, it isn't clear > what > transpired. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thank you to Peter Yee for the GENART review. The promised changes > ( > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/hz0tj9BXoB3AHlGRV9mSY-cmmPQ/) > to > his review have not been merged into the draft. Please do so. > > > >
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list -- lisp@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to lisp-le...@ietf.org
