I support for WGLC. Thanks Balaji
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Date: Monday, January 19, 2026 at 10:54 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: lisp Digest, Vol 206, Issue 7 Send lisp mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of lisp digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: WG Last Call for The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) for Multicast Environments - draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6831bis (Dino Farinacci) 2. Re: WG Last Call for Signal-Free Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) Multicast draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8378bis (Dino Farinacci) 3. Re: WG Last Call for The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) for Multicast Environments - draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6831bis (David Meyer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 10:40:56 -0800 From: Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> Subject: [lisp] Re: WG Last Call for The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) for Multicast Environments - draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6831bis To: Vengada Prasad Govindan <[email protected]> Cc: LISP mailing list list <[email protected]>, [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-75D93D49-A660-4CB0-A307-9366B5DAF3C0 Ditto for me. Dino > On Jan 19, 2026, at 3:44 AM, Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > As an implementor and author, support WGLC for this document. Am not aware of > any undisclosed IPR. > Thanks > Prasad > From: Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:46 PM > To: LISP mailing list list <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: [lisp] WG Last Call for The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) > for Multicast Environments - draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6831bis > > Dear WG > > As requested by the authors, this message starts a two-week WG Last Call for > ending on January 26th 2026. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6831bis/ > > Title: The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) for Multicast Environments > > Abstract: > This document describes the design for inter-domain multicast > overlays using the Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) architecture > and protocols. The document specifies how LISP multicast overlays > operate over multicast and unicast underlays. The mechanisms in this > specification indicate how a signal-based approach using the PIM > protocol can be used to program LISP encapsulators with a replication > list in a locator-set, where the replication list can be a mix of > multicast and unicast locators. This document when approved > obsoletes RFC6831 > > Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is > ready to be handed over to the AD. > > If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain what it > would take to address your concerns. > > Note: silence IS NOT consensus. > > Thanks > > Padma and Luigi > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] -------------- next part -------------- A message part incompatible with plain text digests has been removed ... Name: not available Type: text/html Size: 4720 bytes Desc: not available ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 10:41:17 -0800 From: Dino Farinacci <[email protected]> Subject: [lisp] Re: WG Last Call for Signal-Free Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) Multicast draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8378bis To: Vengada Prasad Govindan <[email protected]> Cc: LISP mailing list list <[email protected]>, [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-F0904400-853A-45BC-AC80-0D8404FD1F13 Ditto as well for me. Dino > On Jan 19, 2026, at 3:45 AM, Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > As implementor and co-author support WGLC. Not aware of any undisclosed IPR > Thanks > Prasad > From: Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:46 PM > To: LISP mailing list list <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: [lisp] WG Last Call for Signal-Free Locator/ID Separation Protocol > (LISP) Multicast draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8378bis > > Dear WG > > As requested by the authors, this message starts a two-week WG Last Call for > ending on January 26th 2026. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8378bis/ > > Title: Signal-Free Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) Multicast > > Abstract: > This document describes the design for inter-domain multicast > overlays using the Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP). The > document specifies how LISP multicast overlays operate over a unicast > underlays. > When multicast sources and receivers are active at Locator/ID > Separation Protocol (LISP) sites, the core network is required to use > native multicast so packets can be delivered from sources to group > members. When multicast is not available to connect the multicast > sites together, a signal-free mechanism can be used to allow traffic > to flow between sites. The mechanism within here uses unicast > replication and encapsulation over the core network for the data > plane and uses the LISP mapping database system so encapsulators at > the source LISP multicast site can find decapsulators at the receiver > LISP multicast sites. This document when approved obosletes RFC8378. > > Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is > ready to be handed over to the AD. > > If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain what it > would take to address your concerns. > > Note: silence IS NOT consensus. > > Thanks > > Padma and Luigi > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] -------------- next part -------------- A message part incompatible with plain text digests has been removed ... Name: not available Type: text/html Size: 4872 bytes Desc: not available ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 10:51:37 -0800 From: David Meyer <[email protected]> Subject: [lisp] Re: WG Last Call for The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) for Multicast Environments - draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6831bis To: [email protected] Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4A5AFE5E-295D-4842-AD55-A7D6FC8881CF" Same here. David Meyer > On Jan 19, 2026, at 3:44 AM, Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > As an implementor and author, support WGLC for this document. Am not aware of > any undisclosed IPR. > Thanks > Prasad > From: Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, January 12, 2026 7:46 PM > To: LISP mailing list list <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]> > Subject: [lisp] WG Last Call for The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) > for Multicast Environments - draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6831bis > > Dear WG > > As requested by the authors, this message starts a two-week WG Last Call for > ending on January 26th 2026. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc6831bis/ > > Title: The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) for Multicast Environments > > Abstract: > This document describes the design for inter-domain multicast > overlays using the Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) architecture > and protocols. The document specifies how LISP multicast overlays > operate over multicast and unicast underlays. The mechanisms in this > specification indicate how a signal-based approach using the PIM > protocol can be used to program LISP encapsulators with a replication > list in a locator-set, where the replication list can be a mix of > multicast and unicast locators. This document when approved > obsoletes RFC6831 > > Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is > ready to be handed over to the AD. > > If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain what it > would take to address your concerns. > > Note: silence IS NOT consensus. > > Thanks > > Padma and Luigi > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list -- [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>-------------- next part -------------- A message part incompatible with plain text digests has been removed ... Name: not available Type: text/html Size: 3409 bytes Desc: not available ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] ------------------------------ End of lisp Digest, Vol 206, Issue 7 ************************************
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
