Hi I support publication of this document. It is in good shape, although I couldn't help spotting a few minor editorial issues. I'm sure the RFC Editor would fix them, but let me list what I found below.
In abstract: This document describes the design for inter-domain multicast overlays using the Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP). The document specifies how LISP multicast overlays operate over a unicast underlays. S/underlays/underlay In abstract: "This document when approved obosletes RFC8378." Typo, and should have space after RFC. In 5.2: "In the ASM case, for (*, G)". Should not have space after comma. In 8: When a Map_server uses "filtered-format', the Map-Reply it originates Note that the start and end quotes are different. Thanks, Stig On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 6:17 AM Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear WG > > As requested by the authors, this message starts a two-week WG Last Call for > ending on January 26th 2026. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lisp-rfc8378bis/ > > Title: Signal-Free Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) Multicast > > Abstract: > This document describes the design for inter-domain multicast > overlays using the Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP). The > document specifies how LISP multicast overlays operate over a unicast > underlays. > When multicast sources and receivers are active at Locator/ID > Separation Protocol (LISP) sites, the core network is required to use > native multicast so packets can be delivered from sources to group > members. When multicast is not available to connect the multicast > sites together, a signal-free mechanism can be used to allow traffic > to flow between sites. The mechanism within here uses unicast > replication and encapsulation over the core network for the data > plane and uses the LISP mapping database system so encapsulators at > the source LISP multicast site can find decapsulators at the receiver > LISP multicast sites. This document when approved obosletes RFC8378. > > Please review this WG document and let the WG know if you agree that it is > ready to be handed over to the AD. > > If you have objections, please state your reasons why, and explain what it > would take to address your concerns. > > Note: silence IS NOT consensus. > > Thanks > > Padma and Luigi > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
