On August 28, 2026 at 2:06:40 AM, Marc Portoles Comeras wrote: > Yes, I also believe that we should be able to generalize. > > However, I don’t think we have any RFC/draft with a use-case that can back > expanding to other AFIs. Do you think we can generalize anyway?
We don't need justification. ;-) I've been using the use-case drafts as examples, but we don't need to have examples for everything. I'll work on generalizing the Security Key LCAF. Thanks! Alvaro. > From: Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal) > Date: Thursday, August 27, 2026 at 7:58 AM ... > Just a quick thought on this one. > > > > - Why can't the Security Key LCAF be used with any AFI? > > If we are to follow the way it is described now, Security Key LCAF is to be > used with a Locator, and Locators are IPv4 or IPv6 as per 9301 [1]. > > Said that, I would be open to generalize the AFI in Security Key so it can > fit possible future use-cases. > > Thanks, > Alberto > > [1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9301.html#section-5.4-5.40
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
