The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9303, "Locator/ID Separation Protocol Security (LISP-SEC)"
-------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://errata.rfc-editor.org/eid9278/ -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Wenbin Zhou <[email protected]> Section 6.2 says: Original Text ------------- | Record Count | Unassigned | EID HMAC ID |EID-AD Corrected Text -------------- | Record Count |E| Unassigned | EID HMAC ID |EID-AD Notes ----- Section 6.1 defines the ETR-Cant-Sign E bit in the EID-AD and states that it signals to the ITR that at least one ETR that is authoritative for the EID-Prefixes of this Map-Reply has not enabled LISP-SEC, and Table 1 of Section 6.7 requires a Map-Server to set it to 1. The ITR only receives the Map-Reply, so the bit must be present in the Map-Reply authentication data. Figure 2 instead shows that octet as an 8-bit "Unassigned" field that is set to 0 on transmission, so the bit could not reach the ITR. The correction restores the E bit in Figure 2 (the layout already used in Figure 1) and adds a corresponding entry to the field list. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". Please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC9303 (draft-ietf-lisp-sec) -------------------------------------- Title : Locator/ID Separation Protocol Security (LISP-SEC) Publication Date : October 2022 Author(s) : F. Maino, V. Ermagan, A. Cabellos, D. Saucez Category : Proposed Standard Source : lisp (rtg) Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
