Rich Kulawiec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I simply gave the technical criteria that I felt were required, and I
> gave them as *additions* to a pre-existing list -- which had technical
> and non-technical requirements. I made no attempt to list additional
> non-technical requirements, which SHOULD NOT be taken as a statement
> that I feel there aren't any: I simply declined to list them because
> I felt considerably more thought was required before doing so.
Understood. And if this is the proper forum, I'd like to see some
of those requirements listed.
I mean, if this is the proper forum, why, I'd say
(1) Knowledge of or facility with the topic.
(2) A true and abiding regard for that subject.
(3) Dedication and time and energy.
(4) Experience with the cycles of one-to-many list dynamics, and
(5) A quick and sure hand in monitoring that spectrum.
(6) Either the hands-on ability or an incessant sniveling personality
to convince site adminstrators of the need for certain features, e.g.,.
(a) verified enrollment
(b) a quick and easy twit ban
(c) the list roster is open to none but the owner
What else?
I wonder if there are list managers who excel in both categories, the
technical and the operational? When I see here comments like, `I'm not
responsible for private mail,' and `I don't care if my list is pirated
as long as it runs like it should,' I wonder.
Of course, if this isn't on-topic for this list, forget I said anything.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tim Bowden)
Proud member of NERDNOSH (tm)!
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] org
the command: subscribe nerdnosh
