I found this in a newsgroup:

Subject: Re: InterNIC - Network Solutions
Summary: an asshole by any other name ...
Date: 24 Mar 1999 15:57:12 GMT

| > Apparently telneting to whois.internic.net doesn't work anymore.
|
| The service you're referring to no longer exists.
|
| You can 'telnet' to whois.internic.net:43 for access to whois, but
| it's the same service you get using 'whois'.  That other service
| where you'd get the "InterNIC> " prompt has been shutdown, probably
| forever.
|
| > The rs.internic.net website goes to www.networksolutions.com now
| > and doesn't mention much about this.
|
| Network Solutions took the InterNIC website down on Saturday without
| notice. They do not plan on ever putting it back up. It's gone!
|
| Apparently, Network Solutions is preparing for the competitive
| registry marketplace that's coming next month. They're capitalizing
| on "internic.net" for their commercial enterprises.
|
| For a timetable of what's coming see
| <http://www.icann.org/timeline.html>.
|
| For some insight on the grand scheme of things, check out Gordan
| Cook's take at <http://cookreport.com/insurgency.html>.
|
| The InterNIC ftp site is still up. I just grabbed copies of all the
| templates in case they take it down also.
|
| Maybe they changed the IP address of the website. Does anyone have
| older and different addresses for "www", "rs", or "whois"?

It seems that there is alot of flak being generated by the high-handed
sequence of events that the InterNIC and NetSol assholes have embarked
upon.

Earlier today, the following message was posted to the lynx-dev mailing-
list:

 > From: Philip Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 > Subject: lynx-dev NS story (ungarbled)
 > Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 09:56:11 -0500 (EST)
 > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 >
 > AP tu 990323 1938
 >
 > Web Management Co Raises Feds' Ire -- TED BRIDIS
 >
 > WASHINGTON (AP) -- The company selected by the US government that assigns
 > most of the World's Internet addresses made a surprise move to steer
 > customers of an important WWW directory to its private commercial site:
 > "We're very concerned", said Commerce Dept administrator Becky Burr: "This
 > was undertaken without consultation with the US government".  People trying
 > to visit the `Internic' directory -- which checks availability of a new WWW
 > address --  > are being sent to Network Solutions' home page, which offers
 > to register Internet addresses with  .com  .net  or  .org  suffixes for
 > $119.  The information is still free, but one must go thro' the commercial
 > site to see it.
 >
 > The government, in the middle of largely ending management of the Internet,
 > is upset, since the directory has traditionally been a community resource
 > -- like a giant WWW phone book -- & `Internic' is a US-govt owned trademark:
 > "This information has been freely available to the Internet community for a
 > long time: if there is a reason to change that, we need to be consulted".
 > It illustrates the difficulty of having private industry run the WWW,
 > which is becoming the most crucial communications medium for the digital
 > age.
 >
 > The change occurred unexpectedly last Friday & infuriated some Internet
 > groups: 100's e-mailed the Commerce Dept: "We're entering a very uncertain
 > period", said Jay Fenello, president, Iperdome: "There are serious questions
 > how this transition will move forward & this is just a symptom".
 >
 > Network Solutions (Herndon VA) has enjoyed a lucrative exclusive agreement
 > with the US government since 1993 to register most of the World's addresses;
 > it has registered  > 4 M  sites & had  $ 93,7 M  sales 1998.  Its decision
 > comes days before a new organization selects  5  companies to compete with
 > it: "They're trying to get as much visibility as they can for as long as
 > they can", complained William Walsh, DSO Net (Fresno CA): "They're going to
 > brand their registrar service `Internic' before there are even other
 > registrars that could compete.  It may be legal, but it speaks of ethical
 > problems".
 >
 > Spokesman Chris Clough said Internic directory is legally a customer list
 > owned by Network Solutions, which decided to consolidate several sites,
 > incl Internic, to anticipate changes in Internet management.
 >
 > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN, CA) has assumed
 > most Internet management responsibilities from the US government & is
 > expected to select  5  new registration companies Worldwide next week.  Its
 > president Michael Roberts & chairwoman Esther Dyson did not respond to phone
 > calls.

Seems like the Department of Commerce is the proper entity to complain to
about the miscreants that are making this unilateral decision, if one were
of a mind to complain about it, that is ... :-) ...

/kim

============================================================================
"We create the government that screws you, and then you're supposed to thank
 us for protecting you from it."   --Congressman Vin Weber (R-Minn)

------- end of quoted message -------


Joe Smith    MCI WorldCom, Network Management, Product Technical Support
UNIX and Tech Sup: TYMNET Network, Xstream Packet Services (Public X.25)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>       2560 N 1st St, MS-5046/746, San Jose, CA 95131
Voice: vnet 854-6220 = 408-922-6220    Fax: vnet 854-6702 = 408-922-6702

Reply via email to