In the immortal words of Christian Weisgerber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> I do notice that there are now a quite a few lists around that have two
> features enabled I consider very stupid, and annoyingly users are asking
> for other lists to be converted to this, namely
> - forcing a Reply-To header with the list address,
> - forcing a [LIST] prefix into the Subject header,
> both of which are intended to help people with poor list handling but
> making it the same more difficult for people with sensible list
> handling (separate folders, gateway to local newsgroups).
Okay, perhaps I'm being dense here... the reasons for "Reply-to" being
harmful are well-known, but how on earth does a [LISTNAME] prefix
in the subject line make like more difficult for people with "sensible"
list-handling procedures? Last I heard, procmail can filter just fine
on subject lines, and it's not like it disables the other standard
filtering mechanisms....
-n
------------------------------------------------------------<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Maybe this never happens / to lovers with braver souls."
(--Groovasaurus)
<http://www.blank.org/memory/>------------------------------------------------
