On Tue, Nov 03, 1998 at 11:17:20AM -0500, Nathan J. Mehl wrote: > Okay, perhaps I'm being dense here... the reasons for "Reply-to" being > harmful are well-known, but how on earth does a [LISTNAME] prefix > in the subject line make like more difficult for people with "sensible" > list-handling procedures? It can break subject threading. -- Lazlo Nibble | "There's no moral, Uncle Remus, just [EMAIL PROTECTED] | random acts of meaningless violence." http://www.swcp.com/lazlo | -- Michael O'Donoghue
- Re: Reply-To Munging murr rhame
- Re: Reply-To Munging Ray Jones
- Re: Reply-To Munging Aaron Schrab
- Re: Reply-To Munging David W. Tamkin
- Re: Reply-To Munging Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Reply-To Munging Ray Jones
- Re: Reply-To Munging D. J. Bernstein
- ``Reply-To'' Munging Considered Harmful (was... Christian Weisgerber
- Re: ``Reply-To'' Munging Considered Harm... Claire McNab
- Re: ``Reply-To'' Munging Considered Harm... D. J. Bernstein
- why tagged subjects are annoying Lazlo Nibble
- why tagged subjects are annoying David W. Tamkin
