Anyone else notice that nowadays, Reply-To 's are often misconfigured? Seems that many ISPs are shipping installation software with something like <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or simply <@isp.com> in the Reply-To field of the mailer. I've seen this a lot recently. Sometimes, the From address is actually the correct one. I don't know how these people ever get replies from people who don't know how to chop thru the headers, but they sometimes leave it broken like that for months! Lovely, eh? -todd-
- Re: Reply-To Munging ChuckMiro
- Re: Reply-To Munging Mitch Collinsworth
- Re: Reply-To Munging Joe Smith
- Re: Reply-To Munging jge
- Re: Reply-To Munging Roger Fajman
- Re: Reply-To Munging murr rhame
- Re: Reply-To Munging Todd Day
- Re: Reply-To Munging Adam Bailey
