On 7/11/00 5:57 PM, Bernie Cosell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote... >On 11 Jul 2000, at 16:20, Adam Bailey wrote: > >> I have written to the people in the know, and confirmed that it is an >> HTML issue. They do not know if and when it will be fixed, as it was >> implemented intentionally. > > [...] > >> Unless this impacts a lot of people, it may not be changed. The problem >> AOL is trying to combat appears much more significant. > >I'm missing something --- what 'problem' are they trying to combat? >What's the terrible problem with having a proper URL in a Subject line? AOL's mail system is heavily HTMLized, but without using variant content-types. Thus, putting <something> into a mail message has the potential of being interpreted as an HTML tag. So AOL added the leading dot, to make sure that wouldn't happen. -- Adam Bailey | Chicago, Illinois [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Finger/Web for PGP [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.lull.org/adam/
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Rich Kulawiec
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Dave Sill
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Dave Sill
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Rachel Blackman
- Re: AOL changing subject head... Mitch Collinsworth
- Re: AOL changing subject head... Cyndi Norman
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Alan S. Harrell
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Adam Bailey
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Tom Neff
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Dave Sill
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Joe Smith
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Adam Bailey
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Adam Bailey
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Michael C. Berch
- RE: AOL changing subject headers? Tegels, Kent
- Re: AOL changing subject headers? Berg
