On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Chuq Von Rospach wrote: > You're fighting a battle that might be noble, but is long > lost. All you're really going to do down the road is convince > folks to not bother with your lists, except your own > increasingly limited brotherhood of already-convinced > like-thinkers. They said radio would kill off newspapers 75yrs ago. The validity of ASCII-only depends on the style, content and intrinsic value of the list in question Chuq. I only accept ASCII and I don't anticipate changing in the near future. If people start to bail, complain in large numbers or another list on the same topic uses HTML and attracts a significant number of subscribers, I'll consider a change. Until then, my experience says ASCII is fine for what I do. I have no objection to other lists accommodating HTML or any other format the admin chooses to allow. Just don't try and tell me ASCII is dead. It works for me. - murr -
- HTML Based Email (AOL 6.0) Allan Newsome
- Re: HTML Based Email (AOL 6.0) Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: HTML Based Email (AOL 6.0) Tim Pierce
- Re: HTML Based Email (AOL 6.0) Robert Comperini
- Re: HTML Based Email (AOL 6.0) Cyndi Norman
- Re: HTML Based Email (AOL 6.0) SRE
- Re: HTML Based Email (AOL 6.0) Alan S. Harrell
- Re: HTML Based Email (AOL 6.0) Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: HTML Based Email (AOL 6.0) Alan S. Harrell
- Re: HTML Based Email (AOL 6.0) Rachel Blackman
- Re: HTML Based Email (AOL 6.0) murr rhame
- Re: HTML Based Email (AOL 6.0) Roger B.A. Klorese
- Re: HTML Based Email (AOL 6.0) Richard Rognlie
- Re: HTML Based Email (AOL 6.0) Adam Bailey
- Re: HTML Based Email (AOL 6.0) Allan Newsome
- Re: HTML Based Email (AOL 6.0) Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: HTML Based Email (AOL 6.0) SRE
- Re: HTML Based Email (AOL 6.0) Cyndi Norman
- Re: HTML Based Email (AOL 6.0) Adam Bailey
- Re: HTML Based Email (AOL 6.0) Roger B.A. Klorese
- Re: HTML Based Email (AOL 6.0) Chuq Von Rospach
