On 9 Dec 2000, at 8:26, Chuq Von Rospach wrote:

> Something that came up on the mailman list...
> 
> At 3:09 AM -0600 12/9/00, Christopher Lindsey wrote:
> 
> >    Yes, this has definitely been troublesome.   I've blocked many
> >    commercial sites like findmail.com (egroups) and remarq.com from my
> >    lists because of their secret archiving that displays email addresses
> >    to the public, but at least they don't spam the lists back.  But
> >    of course anyone can browse these sites and get addresses to their
> >    heart's content, then forge MAIL FROM: to sneak mail into the lists.

> But Murr Rhame on list-managers said something that made me think of 
> a possible answer -- new subscribers automatically go into "hold for 
> approval" mode. it'd be another flag in the user record (like digest 
> or nomail), and when you subscribe, it's turned on. All messages are 
> held for the admin to approve. Once an admin can trust a new account, 
> he turns off the flag and they post without restriction.

That won't help --- if the spammer just uses the on-list-account to 
harvest addresses [perhaps even using the archives to get a *bunch* in a 
hurry] and then just uses suitable forgery to make the spam seem to come 
from a legit account, you have a hard time figuring out who the actual 
perp is...

  /Bernie\

-- 
Bernie Cosell                     Fantasy Farm Fibers
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]     Pearisburg, VA
    -->  Too many people, too few sheep  <--          

Reply via email to