I'm starting to get one of these with every Digest sent out for one of my lists, which has a member @gateway.com. My questions are: (a) is it appropriate for them to be emitting these out for Digests that arrive with "Precedence: bulk"? (b) What happens if everybody starts doing this? I didn't message Gateway's postmaster, btw, because I don't want them collaring some poor shlub in Accounts Receivable and demanding to know why she/he is using company computers to read a non-work related Digest. This is its own meta-problem for many of us, I suspect. [uninteresting headers removed] > Received: from NSC273.gw2k.com (imail.gateway.com [208.203.4.145]) by > lists.ZZZZ.com (8.8.5) id CAA17483; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 02:18:25 -0500 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Coney-Catchers Digest V4 #303 > > Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This message is an automated, computer-generated response from Gateway's > email scanning system. > > Gateway is scanning and logging all Internet email for viruses and > content. Your message may have contained inappropriate content which > triggered the content scanner. Please review the message. Your message > with the subject Coney-Catchers Digest V4 #303 has been sent and WILL BE > DELIVERED normally. The software used by Gateway to conduct scans on > email, searches for words and phrases. It cannot determine the context > of the words and phrases. Microsoft Office products and some > MIME-attached files can generate strings of letters forming some of the > same words and phrases the automated scanner is looking for. This may > have caused a false positive response for your email. If this is the > cause, we apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. Again, > your email was delivered normally, and was not delayed in any way by > content scanning.
