Tim Pierce wrote, | The Berkeley `vacation' algorithm seems to | have held up pretty well over the years: send an autoreply only if | (a) the recipient is personally listed in the `To' or `Cc' headers; | (b) the mail does not have a `Precedence' of `list', `bulk' or | `junk'; and | (c) it doesn't come from an address that is likely to | be a daemon, such as `mailer-daemon', `postmaster', `owner-' and | `-request' addresses. Isn't "the address to which the autoreply would be sent has not already been sent a copy of the current autoreply text" part of the algorithm?
