I am a member of at least 10 lists, i make my living on the internet,
and now in the process of doing a few lists for myself and hosting for
others.

Now what i dislike worse than a test message is the many meaningless
replies to them.. think about it, you get one note from a guy that wonders
if the list is working, then you get 3 or 4 guys that got to reply to it,

why?

if you have 500 members, now you have 1500 or 2000 extra sends to to the
list
all just so a few guys can flex there index finger.

how would i filter the meaningless replys to such notes which cost me more
than
the original test note?

if the test message is such a mind blowing issue then let us figure out  a
configuration command that will grab the test message and send a reply to
the
sender outside of the list, in the same way that you can grab a bounce and
put it in file/list to be sent a test message??

this would be a kind/community act and help the person looking for
confirmation
of the lists operational-ability...

another pet peeve of mine is Spam, yours too, but what IRKS me worse is the
99 replies
to the spammer to a list, why can not the community members write the
spammer in person?

how can i filter the replies to the spammer? which cost me now 99 x 500??

And i also sent a question to this list asking for a little configuration
help, i got
a couple "smart comments" but not advice or help, the reply to the test got
more
response than a plea for help...

i have scoured the internet for help, read all the online manuals, and they
are all standard
clips and copies of the same manual.

in closing may i ask ....

will DList commands work in majordomo?

albert.

albert/brenda zegiel
FARMPRIDE PRODUCTS
223 MAIN STREET
GAYS MILLS, WISCONSIN, 54631
ph-1-608-735-4667 fx 735-4994




> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Keith Flippin
> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 9:56 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: filtering (was Re: test)
>
>
> Nick Simicich wrote:
> >
> > Hmmm...Does anyone else have a strictpolicy forbidding user testing on
> > mailing lists?
>
> Not just a policy, a filter.
>
> Speaking of which, anyone have such a filter that does a good job of
> catching tests without many false positives?
>
> --
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>    Geoff Capp Productions
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  NE-Raves Administrator
> http://DrJesus.djcentral.com under construction
> "Om Ah Hum Vajra Guru Padma Siddhi Hum"
>


Reply via email to