BINGO!! this is what i had in mind to begin with!! so, is there a dual reply or way to add this to one's list.. thanks JC ! albert. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of JC Dill > Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 1:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: test message,or reply's to, which worse? > > > On 08:16 AM 5/28/01, David W. Tamkin wrote: > > >Blind faith in reply-to-all to do the right thing magically without the > >user's reviewing its choices is not perfect either. We agree > that no mail > >client has a "read my mind, know all of netiquette, know the list rules, > >predict the text I plan to type, know the preferences of the > poster to whom > >I'm replying, and figure out the exact right way to address my response" > >command. > > Hmmm. It seems we have an opportunity to write an RFC that would spec a > "reply-to-list" header and a "reply-to-author" header, and discuss how to > implement selection of these two reply options in common email > clients. When the reader has two "reply to" buttons active when reading > any given list post, and can easily and quickly click on the appropriate > button for the reply they plan to send (or even change it later, while > composing, if the reply changes tone while they are writing), it > would make > it a lot easier for everyone to send the reply where they want it to go. > > Or has this already been done? I'm a bit behind in keeping up with email > related RFCs. > > jc > >
