On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 06:53:37PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Rich Kulawiec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > All *excellent* points and a compelling argument for not using an > > HTML-cognizant mail client. > > Or using one that's configurable.
Agreed. (I use mutt and amaya or w3m for mail/web.) But -- and maybe this is an artifact of how I've organized my work -- I never load content directly from a mail message into a web browser. I'll snip specific URLs, I'll sometimes use curl to fetch a page (or curlmirror to fetch many pages), sometimes I'll go through an anonymizer (if I think it's a spammer's site), and so on. Yep, it's definitely more work that way: but not *much* more, and it puts me in the loop...where *hopefully* I'll notice anomalies before I act on them. ;-) ----Rsk
