On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 07:18:19PM -0700, J C Lawrence wrote: > On Sat, 20 Oct 2001 17:49:19 -0700 > Roger B A Klorese <Roger> wrote: > > At 05:06 PM 10/20/2001 -0700, you wrote: > > >> Bounces have the unique quality of have a null return envelope. > >> Filter on that and you'll have no problem. ( > > > With the number of sites violating RFCs and rejecting > > null-envelope bounce messages, my list owners are not getting > > their lists' bounces. I am seriously considering putting in a > > return address on them from here on. > > There's a simple handling for such: null route their mail. If/when > they fix their configs, remove the filter.
There is a RBL-like blacklist service for sites that reject null envelopes: http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/policy-dsn.html David -- David Shaw | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | WWW http://www.jabberwocky.com/ +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ "There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence." - Jeremy S. Anderson
