On 10/22/01 5:58 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My opinion is that they read the RFC precisely and you missed a spot. > This does not seem to be an implementation limit but a configured site- > policy limitation (as far as we can tell). Wasn't it on this list where we were having the discussion about not accepting mail from <>, even though the spec says to? Are we really saying it's okay for us to violate the RFC for anti-spam purposes, but not Yahoo? Not that yahoo is, unlike the people rejecting <>. But that seems to be what I'm hearing here.
