On Thu, 01 Aug 2002 15:50:29 -0700 Chuq Von Rospach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But one of the things that isn't currently being talked about (nor, I > think, should it be) is cloaking content, like .sigs. So if it's in > your .sig, it'll be public, no matter what the list server does. My intent and prior statements on this regard are that I'd check for addresses in headers and message bodies. While it would be easy to make an explicit exception for addresses in ..signatures, what I want to avoid is the harvesting of a (comparative) innocent just because somebody else quoted his address in a web archived email. -- J C Lawrence ---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas. [EMAIL PROTECTED] He lived as a devil, eh? http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
