On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Chuq Von Rospach wrote: > There's already a defacto standard of X-No-Archive for "do not > archive this message". > > How about creating another header: > > X-No-Archive-List: (descriptive string).
X-No-Archive-List: is too similar to X-No-Archive-List:. They would be confused with each other. Also, X-No-Archive-List: is not accurate: some of us want to allow private archives (available only for the users of a particular machine, organization or intranet), but not public ones. Perhaps X-No-Public-Archive-List: would work. Thomas Gramstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
