Charlie Summers wrote: [snip old bits]
Well, overquoting is easy to slip into, and I am always being remindedBut his unnecessary over-quoting, ASCII signature, and bothersome top-posting aside, the situation Mr. Bailey notes _does_ exist on some machines even if it is different than what Mr. Giorgi was discussing, so if you're really paranoid about security, the only way to be certain a machine over which you have no control won't expand in clear additional envelope addresses is to make sure there's only one there.
to cut it dowen to the essecially required parts. sigh. And the sigfile
has been edited as you see below.
but I am devloping tinylist, and some users of it NEED to have security. Granted that some lists do not demand this, and it is not for them important, but I have to take into account that SOME users WILL need it.
I saw one MLM which stuffed the entire list of recipients into the TO: field. Big bad idea. Not only does it give away lots of addresses, it also can (on a large list) exaust the available space for the headers.
--
end
Respectfully,
Kirk D Bailey
"Thou Art Free." - Eris
---------------------------------------------
Introducing NetZero Long Distance
1st month Free!
Sign up today at: www.netzerolongdistance.com
